Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Almanac data puzzle: 9 Dec 1941
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2025 Jul 15, 16:22 -0700

    Articles like that one are typical of accounts of stories like this. They emphasize the absurdity or perceived stupidity. But this misses the key astronomical aspect here: Venus is shockiungly bright in daylight. Many authors and readers, in fact, assume that the stories are about Venus at night, which is a very different animal.

    The link you found from "americaisweird.com" at least manages not to confuse two distinct incidents. A few days back, Dave W. posted a link to an article from "iflscience.com" (for anyone unfamiliar with the name, that "IFLscience" is a shorthand for "I f--ing love science"). That article began by talking about USS New York in 1945 then mixed in the story of USS Langley in 1941 without recognizing that they were separate incidents. 

    There's a little more on the Venus incident aboard USS New York here: http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/ww_reg_his/162. The date isn't clear but may have been around February 1, 1945 while sailing mid-Pacific. And yes, Venus was very bright at that time. Since the captain was reportedly practicing his golf swing on a bridge wing, this was another case in daylight very similar to the case of USS Langley a little over three years earlier, though the crew of USS New York did not have the excuse of the heightened alert the day after Pearl Harbor. The two vessels did share one other trait: they were both old, nearly obsolete ships. "New York" had been launched in 1912.

    Other incidents could have occurred during that war. Inferior conjunctions of Venus happen every 1.6 years (584 days). The times of maximum daylight visibilty are a month or two before inferior conjunction and similarly after. There was a conjunction on Feb 2, 1942, another on about Sep 9, 1943, followed by Apr 15, 1945, and so on. Needless to say, there have been other wars! Was there something about the nature of war in the 1940s that made these events more likely or more worthy of being reported? In that decade recently invented aerial warfare combined with low-quality radar might have been key ingredients...

    Frank Reed

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join / Get NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site