NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Mark Coady
Date: 2025 Aug 14, 16:46 -0700
OK, I apologize for rambling question the other day. Very tired, looked at too many things at once, rusty, and I confused myself. I was working on a review of flare sightings on the horizon. Grabbing stuff from everywhere.
If I could reduce my question to one.. We approximate visible distance vs height of each object: Often 1.17 * Square Root He (height of the eye. or object etc)
I was told a refraction approximation is included in the factor, which can vary. I first learned it decades ago from USCG study guides as 1.14, Then was "corrected" by someone and relearned it as 1.17, and I understand and the NOAA Coast Pilot Uses 1.15.
Refraction varies continuously along a path with atmosphere conditions and temp, particularly a concern at very low angles. OK. Is there any rough rule to bias your favorite constant selection.
Let's say:
- Its summer day and the 3 H's (hazy, hot, humid)..... constant is x.xx
(type of days we sees ships floating in the air.) Ok can't correct for that...but... - Oops its now summer night, cooler and more damp...constant is x.xx
- Oh its winter North Atlantic (cold with sea smoke fog).... x.xx
- Ok in the warm gulf stream chasing fishies... x.xx
- Or I'm near the coast looking at lighthouses so probobly more this way x.xx
- Or I'm in open ocean far from shore so its more likely x.xx
Maybe more pontification and stupidity on my part. A jelly bean, but... Just wondering which factor you would pick and why.
MC






