NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"
From: Herbert Prinz
Date: 2004 Apr 2, 01:30 -0500
From: Herbert Prinz
Date: 2004 Apr 2, 01:30 -0500
Renee Mattie wrote: > I'm having problems with "100 Problems" > [...] after working the first 6 problems, I am finding myself 5-10 miles > away from the > author most of the time. Renee, I reduced problem 1-6 with a computer program and obtained a fix at N 40 09.6 W 046 5.2 where Gray gets N 40 09 W 46 04. A difference of 1 mile in each coordinate is too high to blame it on different sight reduction methods. More likely, the difference comes from a bad estimate or an arbitrary choice of the MPP (most probable position) within the cocked hat. Since the cocked hat consists of 6 lines it is difficult to guess the MPP from the geometry of the LOPs. However, 5 miles difference indicates an error. I notice that Gray specifies index correction, not index error. Did you get this right? A confusion of this kind can easily throw you off by 5 miles. Post your results for problem 1-6 (DR, intercepts and azimuths of individual LOPs), then we can discuss them. Those who think that particular sight reduction methods can lead to a result 5 miles off are invited to demonstrate them to us so that we can avoid these methods in the future. Herbert Prinz