NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: About artificial horizons and bubble levels
From: Richard M Pisko
Date: 2008 Aug 25, 02:10 -0600
From: Richard M Pisko
Date: 2008 Aug 25, 02:10 -0600
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:41:50 -0600, plswrote: > I think you are spot-or re the 30" levels. In the surveying world, > level accuracy breaks down as follows: A Wild T1 Theodolite, which > was for many years the standard for low-order triangulation used a 30" > bubble for leveling the instrument. The next instrument up, a T2 > "Universal" theodolite had a 20" bubble -- it was so-called a > "universal" because it could be used for every surveying application > short of 1st and 2nd order triangulation, which required a Wild T3 > "Precision" theodolite, which had a 6.5" bubble. One thing all three Wild models had was a "split bubble" lens and prism set added to the level vial. The bubble looked to be split in half longitudinally, with the rear end half turned and flipped to be bookmatched to the forward half. Aligning the ends carefully with a fine threaded screw would be much easier than reading two ends of the same level vial between marks with a magnifying glass. The advantage was that the observer could be using a less sensitive bubble, which would settle down more quickly, and have superior accuracy to the competition of the time. -- Richard . . . Using Opera 9.2.4 after the "Dog" died --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---