NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Advice concerning sextants
From: Ken Gebhart
Date: 2010 Feb 23, 16:03 -0600
From: Ken Gebhart
Date: 2010 Feb 23, 16:03 -0600
George, I do not agree that the total must equal 100%. Neglecting absorption, I agree that light going through the mirror in one direction would have reflection and transmission adding up to 100%. But where light goes through in both directions, with the proper coating on the glass, the sum could be greater than 100%. I believe that was the whole idea of the invention of whole horizon type mirrors (Allview, Transflex, etc.) Am I wrong? Does anyone else care to jump in on this? Ken On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:42 PM, George Huxtable wrote: > Ken Gebhart wrote- > > "...2. Whole horizon mirrors do not divide the light. They have a > specialized coating which transmits a large percentage of light, > while at > the same time reflects a large percentage of light. > > I don't fully understand what Ken's saying here, but whatever it > is, I'm > inclined to disagree. > > Such a mirror can reflect some light, transmit some light, and > absorb some > light. The total has to add up to 100% of the incident light. It can't > create light that wasn't there. So it DOES divide the light, as > best it can, > between reflecting and transmitting, absorbing as little as > possible. What > else is Ken telling us? > > The most pithy description of whole-horizon mirrors is that they > make easy > sights easier, and difficult sights harder. But I've had very little > personal experience with such mirrors, so am not competent to > express an > opinion. > > George. > > contact George Huxtable, at george@hux.me.uk > or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222) > or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Gebhart"> To: > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 5:15 PM > Subject: [NavList] Re: Advice concerning sextants > > > |I would like to make two comments about Jim's posts: > | 1. Bigger mirrors do not give more light. (Is your image while > | shaving with a large bathroom mirror brighter than with a small > one?) > | 2. Whole horizon mirrors do not divide the light. They have a > | specialized coating which transmits a large percentage of light, > | while at the same time reflects a large percentage of light. > | > | Ken > | On Feb 22, 2010, at 11:40 PM, James N Wilson wrote: > | > | > John reminds me of my first experience with the whole horizon > sextant > | > mirror, which I called the half silvered mirror, was that > finding the > | > horizon in dim light was difficult. I found no advantages, in > that the > | > sun and moon images can be seen in the clear part of the mirror, > | > aiding > | > in bringing them down. > | > > | > Now, if someone would make a horizon mirror that was half > silvered on > | > only the left side, that might be worth something. But I might > | > still have > | > the same problem at twilight, where I need all the light available > | > to see > | > the horizon. > | > > | > I'm sure that the article mentioned noted that half silvered > | > mirrors (one > | > way glass) allow only a portion of the light to pass. When we > | > remodeled > | > our bath, we had one installed in our shower for privacy. The > room was > | > significantly darkened, and plants wouldn't grow. The amount of > light > | > reduction is significant. > | > > | > Jim Wilson > | > ____________________________________________________________ > | > Nutrition > | > Improve your career health. Click now to study nutrition! > | > > cp=NVIXY2oLGPGa1TCho6UV4QAAJ1D3lHlZVltl3Pnu3pZYfILRAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > | > AAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASQwAAAAA= > | > > | > > | > | > | > | > > >