NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Altitudes, close to 90
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Nov 26, 16:18 -0400
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Nov 26, 16:18 -0400
Alex, You wrote: > Everyone knows that measuring altitudes close to 90 is > hard, however I have not seen the precise explanation of this > in the books on navigation that I read. > > As I think this is of more relevance to > practical navigators than my previous message, > I include a quantitative explanation. > > The source of error is that you cannot determine precisely > the point on the horizon which is exactly "below" the body. I think you have that wrong. The point on the horizon that is exactly below the body is the point that the body is brought down to when the sextant frame is exactly vertical. The problem is ensuring that verticality. With a body of moderate altitude, one can swing the arc and fairly easily see when the body reaches the lowest point, which is when the sextant is vertical. As the altitude increases towards 90 degrees, the apparent radius of the swung arc increases and the point along it corresponding to the vertical becomes harder to determine. Trevor Kenchington -- Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@iStar.ca Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250 R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251 Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555 Science Serving the Fisheries http://home.istar.ca/~gadus