NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Backlash
From: Jared Sherman
Date: 2005 May 25, 14:13 -0400
From: Jared Sherman
Date: 2005 May 25, 14:13 -0400
Alex- I would expect that any sextant will have some backlash, unless *every* tooth in the sextant arm is cut at precisely the correct same angle on both sides, referenced to the pivot point on the arm, and the helix on the drum is similarly machined to exactly the same angle (bevel) on both sides, again consistantly along the entire length. If there is any mismatch at any point, the drum would "rock" a bit at that particular point, and even spring tension would not zero that out, it would simply make the error more consistant from one time to the next. At least, that's the way it appears to me. I know "engine turning" was a big step in the industrial revolutionand in theory all of those angles and faces could be perfectly uniform given good manufacturing. Still, I suppose each manufacturer would have different tolerances allowable in this. Presumably as a sextant wore a bit with age, it might "polish in" and the angles become even more uniform. Or less--if the uneven use of different parts of the arc, wear from salt grit, etc. made a difference. Perhaps that is a topic you could explore with Plath when you get to them. I have dealt with both Plath and Freiberger via email, and found both firms to be outstanding examples of professionalism. If only every business treated their customers the same way!