NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Beginner
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2005 Sep 16, 22:05 -0700
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2005 Sep 16, 22:05 -0700
I've owned both a Davis Mark 3 and a Mark 20. The Mark 3 is a relatively unsophisticated instrument, at best suitable for the crudest of celestial sights. On the other hand, the Mark 15/20/25 series seem to be pretty decent sextants. Admittedly not the equal of a Tayama, Freiberger, Plath, or even an Astra 3B, but I've seen a lot of people pass celestial navigation courses (eg, the USPS courses) using them. I've used my Mark 20 on my boat to practice celestial. When a small boat is rolling and pitching, arguments about whether there's 0.1 min of backlash in the vernier drum become pretty irrelevant. Lu Abel Fred Hebard wrote: > I've got a Mark III. It's much harder to adjust than a sextant with a > drum. It doesn't have a magnifier, which makes it harder to judge > contact, and is difficult to set. It's horizon mirror is also split, > so it's tough to bring images into contact: there's no overlap of the > reflected and straight images as with a half-silvered horizon mirror. > You need to use the vernier to read to the nearest arcminute (or > possibly to the nearest 5 or 10 arcminutes). So you can't just read > the minutes off the dial. You can't read below an arcminute (or > perhaps 5 or 10 arcminutes). > > The index arm is so sticky that it's tough to nudge it except in one > direction, which is what I meant in the previous paragraph when I said > it is difficult to set. A difference in reading depending upon the > direction of adjustment may occur due to slop in the pivot bearing. > Never tried to measure that. > > On Sep 16, 2005, at 10:00 PM, Herbert Prinz wrote: > >> The Davis Mark 3 has a Vernier scale. I don't understand why it should >> make a difference wich way you move the index arm before reading. This >> is only a concern with micrometer drums. >> >> Herbert Prinz >> >> >> >> Espen S. Ore wrote: >> >>> Given the way the Davis Mk. III works I believe it is >>> difficult to come any closer than 1-2", and that yes, one should move >>> the arm in the same direction for all the shots. >> >> > >