NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Benefits of Stigmatizing
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2010 Sep 21, 14:47 EDT
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2010 Sep 21, 14:47 EDT
I don't know if we are using the same terms here Greg. When you say a
stigmatizer to me, I think of an optical device that transforms pinpoint light
sources (stars) to horizontal lines so that they are easier to place on the
visible horizon. I have never used one of these, or even seen a sextant so
equipped so cannot comment. I don't know how this device can help
determine the sextant is vertical unless I am missing something about it.
The device on the C&P Horizon Ultra that allows the user to determine
if the sextant is vertical they call a "double prism lens" in the Celestaire
catalog. I have used this and have never gotten good results with it
unless I swung it out of the way. I find the traditional rocking of
the sextant to find the nadir or apex of the arc to be easier than the double
prism. The other draw back of the dbl prism is the need for a whole
horizon glass which many navigators do not favor.
Are you talking about one or the other in particular here? What has
been your experience with the dbl prism on your C&P?
Jeremy
In a message dated 9/21/2010 2:37:55 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
gregrudzinski@yahoo.com writes:
Any opinions on the benefits of a stigmatizer when observing stars or planets? It seems that it would primarily help keep the sextant vertical to the horizon during the twilight period. Stigmatizers are not common to most sextants so there must be some draw backs.
Greg Rudzinski
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------