Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: The Big Sextant Manufacturers
    From: Robert Eno
    Date: 2007 Oct 23, 10:10 -0400

    Alexander wrote:
    >
    > Can you really testify that C. sextant performs better than
    > Tamaya or Freiberger?
    > Or it is just the snob appeal?
    
    Robert responds:
    
    With respect to the Frieberger, yes, absolutely. No question. With respect to 
    the Tamaya, I have only used these on a few occassions and did not like the 
    "feel" of them. But if you re-read my post, I was referring to Cassens and 
    sextant as being, in my humble opinion, the best of the lot in today's 
    market. If you want a statistical analysis of the two, you're outta luck.
    
    I agree that in some cases, preference in choosing a sextant can be quite 
    subjective and yes, I readily admit that snob appeal was one of the 
    motivations for my purchasing a C.sextant.  Guilty my friend!  Guilty! But, 
    aside from snob appeal, there were a whole host of other, more practical 
    considerations that lead to my final choice.
    
    Alexander wrote:
    
    >
    > It is interesting to know what the reputation of various
    > brands really depends on. Has anyone really seriously
    > compared
    > performance of various brands?
    
    Off the top of my head, I cannot think of any published works on this topic. A 
    lot of authors side step the issue. When I was on my steep learning curve, I 
    had the good fortune to have some first class mentors at my disposal: all 
    ex-Navy officers with decades of solid experience in the pre-GPS era where 
    having a good sextant was crucial to safe and accurate navigation. To a man, 
    they all believed that C.sextant and Cassens and sextant shared the apex of 
    the sextant world, with all others vying for position as second, third, 
    fourth etc. And all of them owned either a C.sextant or a Cassens and 
    sextant. The late Bruce Bauer (author of the Sextant Handbook)for example, 
    owned a Cassens and sextant.
    
    Having myself carefully examined and used many types of sextants, I share 
    their sentiment. An interesting thing to note is that Bruce Bauer indicated 
    that the late Frank Janicek of Maryland Precision Optical in Baltimore, felt 
    that Cassens and sextant was the superior sextant because, from the 
    perspective of the instrument repair man, they are easier to work on.
    
    I don't pretend to be an expert. I can only pass on the "wisdom" of my own 
    limited experience. Others may have more compelling reasons to support their 
    own preferences.
    
    cheers,
    
    Robert
    
    
    
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site