NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Captain Schufeldt's report on marine sextants
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2002 Dec 27, 16:28 +0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2002 Dec 27, 16:28 +0000
Marc Bernstein asked- >Do you in fact get more accurate results from computer sight reduction and >almanac than from the printed versions? Assuming of course that the accuracy >of the sextant sight isn't an order of magnitude worse. ===================== Yes, that appears to be the case. In the Nautical Almanac we are informed that the tabulated quantities are generally correct to the nearest 0.1', except for the Sun which has been adjusted by up to 0.15' to simplify interpolations. When interpolating to an intermediate time between the tabulated values, errors increase, and the largest error that can occur in the interpolated GHA or Dec of any body except for the Sun or Moon is less than 0.2'; it may reach 0.25 for the GHA of the Sun and 0.3' for that of the Moon. The most demanding requirement a navigator is likely to make of the Nautical Almanac is in calculating the Lunar Distance between two bodies, say the Sun and the Moon, in which the errors in both bodies will to some extent combine. Because the lunar distance itself does not involve the horizon (except for minor correction purposes), then measurements of lunar distance can be made to great accuracy, maybe significantly greater accuracy than the lunar distance can be calculated using the Nautical Almanac. For all other sextant measurements, in which the horizon plays a part, the position of the horizon adds sufficient uncertainty that it almost certainly swamps any error in the Almanac predictions. On the other hand, computations of the positions of most celestial bodies, without such interpolation, can be made to an accuracy suitable for astronomers (MUCH more demanding than us navigators) using the methods described in Meeus, Astronomical Algorithms. His Moon predictions, however, are quoted only as being to "approximastely 10"" or 0.17', which appear to be adequate for calculating lunar distances. Maximum errors are not given. If higher accuracies are needed, Meeus provides references for obtaining the data. Her Majesty's Nautical Almanac Office issues a PC program on CD, "AstroNav PC and Compact Data 2001 - 2005", also published in the UK by The Stationery Office as "NavPac and Compact Data 2001 - 2005". As well as the CD data, polynomials are printed so that positions can be obtained using a calculator.. Claimed maximum errors (in GHA) are Sun 0.03' Planets 0.04' Moon 0.21' Stars 0.05' This accuracy is probably sufficient for calculating lunar distances. The conclusion is that the Nautical Almanac provides predictions of sufficient accuracy, but only marginally so for calculating lunar distances. Computed data can improve significantly on that accuracy. There are many astronomical prediction programs now available for PCs, and it would be interesting for owners to supply claimed accuracy for the predictions of those programs, particularly as it applies to geocentric position of the Moon. George Huxtable ------------------------------ george@huxtable.u-net.com George Huxtable, 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. Tel. 01865 820222 or (int.) +44 1865 820222. ------------------------------