NavList:

   

Reply

Patrick

Thank you for your prompt an illuminating response.

I am indeed William Burchell. Pennywise would make Charles Ponzi, Billy
Sol Estes et al proud.  Some many customers, so few working watches.

I am ecstatic I did not order undershorts from them.  Used,
non-refurbished, sent to me my a disgruntled customer....

Bill B

For the legal beagles out there, since Pennywise used the system of UPS
to USPS for delivery, would that constitute mail fraud?

In terms of follow up/payback, I am well under the 30-day limit to go
Rambo on Pennywise through Pay Pal and Capitol One.

Should I
1. Contact Pennywise and inform them the watch does not work, with the
possibility that they try the same trick they did with Patrick and send
me an envelope that would constitute more evidence for the USPS etc.?

2. Contact Pennywise and detail the deceit, demanding a "new" watch or
refund.

3. Other


On 7/11/2012 11:49 AM, Patrick Goold wrote:
> Dear Bill,
> I am not associated with Pennywise in any way except as you are, i.e. as
> a dissatisfied customer.  I received two watches, one did not work.  I
> reported this to Pennywise and they emailed me a prepaid and
> preaddressed mailing label.  The addressee on the label was William
> Burchell.  I assumed that was someone associated with Pennywise.  I
> repacked the nonfunctioning watch, attached the prepared mailing label
> and dropped the envelope in the mail.  Are you William Burchell?  If so,
> I cannot understand what Pennywise is up to.  Recirculating
> non-functioning merchandise in this way is not a pathway to success.  I
> am very upset to have been used in this way.  I thought I was returning
> the watch to them.

   

Reply