NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Celestial Calculator Comparisons
From: Joe Shields
Date: 2000 Mar 10, 9:01 AM
From: Joe Shields
Date: 2000 Mar 10, 9:01 AM
As a landlocked armchair navigator who dreams of one day moving beyond my little 1 nm wide (at its widest part) man-made lake and out into blue water where I could do celestial nav. for real, I may be naive, but I am confused by all this concern over celestial calculators. Wouldn't regular use of an 'electronic' celestial calculator defeat the whole purpose of celestial navigation -- a reliable alternative/backup to 'electronics'. Doing sight reduction by hand (in both my opinion and the opinion of the ASA Instructor who certified me) is a volatile skill that needs to be practiced regularly to be reliable. What you don't use, you lose... which could be everything from your copy of HO 249 (or whatever) to doing accurate mental arithmetic. Is my thinking wrong that the best discipline is that my daily navigation would consist of doing traditional 'non-electronic' celestial/coastal/DR navigation to arrive at my position and then check it against the GPS. With everything in close agreement, my comfort-level would be such that any 'electronic' outage would not give rise to panic or drastically alter my navigational routine. Or is it more realistic that you are busier than a one-armed paperhanger, and you need all the shortcuts you can get. -- Joe Shields (lat:40 34, long:80 04)