NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Dip and Temperature Gradient
From: Marcel Tschudin
Date: 2013 May 24, 16:01 +0300
From: Marcel Tschudin
Date: 2013 May 24, 16:01 +0300
Paul showed us here http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Dip-Temperature-Gradient-Hirose-may-2013-g24035 how the dip depends on differences in height, temperature and pressure between observer and horizon. I finally found some time to go through his contribution in detail and can only now fully appreciate it. Again, thank you Paul. There is not much to add except that at the end I would go one step further and show also his eq. 6 in combination of his eq. 5 which results in the eq. 7 below which calculates the dip at standard nautical conditions (10°C, 1010hPa) for a given height of eye, h in m, and a "mean lapse rate" LR (= - dT/dh) between this height and the horizon (sea level): dip' = 1.926′ * √[ h * (0.7835 + 6.337 * LR) ] (eq. 7) Note that the square root blows up when reaching an inversion of LR = -0.124 K/m. This is about the value where ducting starts, i.e. where refraction becomes infinite. For more information on this condition see here http://mintaka.sdsu.edu/GF/explain/simulations/ducting/duct_intro.html It should again be mentioned that eq. 7 was derived using a simplified 1-Layer-Model between observer and horizon levels and assuming temperature T to be linear dependant on height h. This coarse model has shown to be quite useful for various applications. However, if one intends to refine it one has to consider that near the earth's surface the temperature is only linear dependant on the logarithm of the height. It would therefore be wrong to use in eq. 7 for the "mean lapse rate" LR a value calculated from the temperature difference between sea water and air at height of eye. Marcel