NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: English Channel Crossings
From: Herbert Prinz
Date: 2001 Jul 12, 12:07 AM
From: Herbert Prinz
Date: 2001 Jul 12, 12:07 AM
Nigel and Aubrey, Thank you for confirming what I vaguely remember from sailing there over 15 years ago. The reason why I am asking this is because we also have traffic separation schemes here at the entrances to New York, Boston, etc. But notes in my NOAA charts explicitely state: "TRAFFIC SEPARATION SCHEME" "One-way traffic lanes overprinted on this chart are RECOMMENDED [their emphasis] for use by all vessels traveling between the points involved. They have been designed to aid in the prevention of collisions at the approach to [xxx] Harbor, but are not intended in any way to supersede or alter the applicable Rules of the Road." Now, am I misinterpreting this, if I think I can completely ignore the traffic lanes, if I chose to do so, or is this only meant as a restatement of Rule 10(a), meaning I don't need to use the separation scheme, but IF I get in, I have to follow rule 10, and all the other ones? And how would all this square with Rule 10(d)(i), which more or less states that a vessel over 20m must use the lane, if possible? What is the wording on the piloting directions or charts for the the English Channel? Is the use of the separation schemes mandatory there (save for the provisions of Rule 10(d)(ii))? I am not interested in a discussion about whether it would be suicidal ar at least extremely silly to ignore the traffic lanes. I just want to understand what, exactly, the regulations demand from me, and whether that might be a different thing from place to place. Herbert Prinz (from 1368950/-4603950/4182550 ECEF)