NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: R: Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP's
From: Henry Halboth
Date: 2008 Aug 10, 10:39 -0700
From: Henry Halboth
Date: 2008 Aug 10, 10:39 -0700
Hi all, I have been sulking in the background on the subject of averaging and analyzing individual sights to the extent spoken of on this list, however, as Jeremy has now spoken up, I will add my two cents worth. In my long past experience, USMM, USN, and USCG, I have seldom, if ever, witnessed the averaging of routine individual sights, or even heard the subject spoken of, except in textbooks. As Jeremy indicates, the duties of a MM watch officer, or for that matter any MM officer, are such as to preclude the time for repetitious sights or analysis. This statement may not hold true for the USN or USCG, where there may have been sufficient manning to afford the luxury of a dedicated "Navigator", although on smaller ships this responsibility was often a collateral duty - still the averaging of sights was certainly not general practice, if at all practiced. Certainly it was true that, under adverse conditions where routine sights might not be available, to take multiple sights of an individual single body as it might come into fleeting view, if nothing else was available, and then to work each sight individually in an evaluation of potential error induced by changing horizon conditions, necessary haste in observing, or other influencing factors. However, in such circumstances, if appropriate, the RDF would have been manned, the fathometer operating, and an armed deep sea lead in use. I am of course speaking of days before Loran, Decca, SatNav, Radar and, in some circumstances a Gyro Compass, etc. Regards, Henry --- On Sun, 8/10/08, Anabasis75@aol.comwrote: > From: Anabasis75@aol.com > Subject: [NavList 6096] Re: R: [NavList /] Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP's > To: NavList@fer3.com > Date: Sunday, August 10, 2008, 11:43 AM > I would like to see some of the problems. I am sure my > computer program can > go back that many years. > > As you can see with my exercise posts, I was entertaining > the list group > with some sight from sea, ranging from the simple to the > fairly exotic. Once I > return to sea in October, I will add more exercises to the > list. > > It is not common practice in the US Merchant Marine to take > and average more > then 3 sights in my experience, and to be honest, I have > only very rarely > seen any sights averaged, and those were always sun lines. > I have heard tell > of Captains taking a round of stars in one set, then > shooting the same stars > sometime later in the same twilight, but have never seen > this in practice, > even on the training ships. > > For this reason, I find it interesting all of this talk > about finding slopes > and speaking of probability mathematics, when the subject > is not even in the > curriculum of a Deck officer college course. Frankly, the > deck officer > hardly has the time to shoot a round of stars and reduce > them on the computer > among his myriad of other duties, let alone spend the time > shooting a body > multiple times and then finding slope lines. I am > permitted to shoot stars only > when there is no traffic or I am not on watch, even then, i > feel the loss of > situational awareness. This is why you see my multi-shots > done in a matter of > minutes and they are reduced later in my stateroom. > > Jeremy > > > In a message dated 8/9/2008 7:55:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight > Time, > fedeastro.rossi@libero.it writes: > > > Jeremy, > you're right, what I got is only an estimated position, > which is meaningless > unless the 1900 ZT position is considered a DR position as > it used to happen > before GPS. > I still have some navigation notes that my father took > when he was an > Italian merchant marine deck officer. They are real life > celnav problems and > if anyone is interested I would be glad to post some of > them here. > Federico > > > > > > **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and > fits in your budget? > Read reviews on AOL Autos. > (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 > ) > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---