Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: R: Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP's
    From: Henry Halboth
    Date: 2008 Aug 10, 10:39 -0700

    Hi all,
    
    I have been sulking in the background on the subject of averaging and 
    analyzing individual sights to the extent spoken of on this list, however, as 
    Jeremy has now spoken up, I will add my two cents worth.
    
    In my long past experience, USMM, USN, and USCG, I have seldom, if ever, 
    witnessed the averaging of routine individual sights, or even heard the 
    subject spoken of, except in textbooks. As Jeremy indicates, the duties of a 
    MM watch officer, or for that matter any MM officer, are such as to preclude 
    the time for repetitious sights or analysis. This statement may not hold true 
    for the USN or USCG, where there may have been sufficient manning to afford 
    the luxury of a dedicated "Navigator", although on smaller ships this 
    responsibility was often a collateral duty - still the averaging of sights 
    was certainly not general practice, if at all practiced.
    
    Certainly it was true that, under adverse conditions where routine sights 
    might not be available, to take multiple sights of an individual single body 
    as it might come into fleeting view, if nothing else was available, and then 
    to work each sight individually in an evaluation of potential error induced 
    by changing horizon conditions, necessary haste in observing, or other 
    influencing factors. However, in such circumstances, if appropriate, the RDF 
    would have been manned, the fathometer operating, and an armed deep sea lead 
    in use. I am of course speaking of days before Loran, Decca, SatNav, Radar 
    and, in some circumstances a Gyro Compass, etc.
    
    Regards,
    
    Henry
    
    
    --- On Sun, 8/10/08, Anabasis75@aol.com  wrote:
    
    > From: Anabasis75@aol.com 
    > Subject: [NavList 6096] Re: R: [NavList /] Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP's
    > To: NavList@fer3.com
    > Date: Sunday, August 10, 2008, 11:43 AM
    > I would like to see some of the problems.  I am sure my
    > computer  program can
    > go back that many years.
    >
    > As you can see with my exercise posts, I was entertaining
    > the list group
    > with some sight from sea, ranging from the simple to the
    > fairly exotic.   Once I
    > return to sea in October, I will add more exercises to the
    > list.
    >
    > It is not common practice in the US Merchant Marine to take
    > and average  more
    > then 3 sights in my experience, and to be honest, I have
    > only very rarely
    > seen any sights averaged, and those were always sun lines.
    > I have heard  tell
    > of Captains taking a round of stars in one set, then
    > shooting the same  stars
    > sometime later in the same twilight, but have never seen
    > this in practice,
    > even on the training ships.
    >
    > For this reason, I find it interesting all of this talk
    > about finding  slopes
    > and speaking of probability mathematics, when the subject
    > is not even in  the
    > curriculum of a Deck officer college course.  Frankly, the
    > deck officer
    > hardly has the time to shoot a round of stars and reduce
    > them on the computer
    > among his myriad of other duties, let alone spend the time
    > shooting a body
    > multiple times and then finding slope lines.  I am
    > permitted to shoot stars  only
    > when there is no traffic or I am not on watch, even then, i
    > feel the loss  of
    > situational awareness.  This is why you see my multi-shots
    > done in a  matter of
    > minutes and they are reduced later in my stateroom.
    >
    > Jeremy
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 8/9/2008 7:55:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight
    > Time,
    > fedeastro.rossi@libero.it writes:
    >
    >
    > Jeremy,
    > you're right, what I got is only an estimated position,
    >  which is meaningless
    > unless the 1900 ZT position is considered a DR  position as
    > it used to happen
    > before GPS.
    > I still have some navigation  notes that my father took
    > when he was an
    > Italian merchant marine deck  officer. They are real life
    > celnav problems and
    > if anyone is interested I  would be glad to post some of
    > them  here.
    > Federico
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and
    > fits in your budget?
    > Read reviews on AOL Autos.
    > (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017
    > )
    >
    >
    
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site