Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Historical Lunars : take in account 'delta-T' or ignore it ?
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2009 Dec 15, 00:23 -0800

    Dear Paul,


    First of all, and since some other NavList Members recently seem to have difficulties reading the correct Posts sequence numbering (recent Server change completed by Frank ?), I am just specifying that

    THIS CURRENT POST REPLIES TO YOUR POST PUBLISHED IN [NavList 11159]

    *******

    Thank you very much for your last reply. I will answer as follows :


    ---

    EXOTIC TERMS / HTML MESSAGE


    Sorry for lazily selecting directly from my keyboard a sign which more or less looks like the "smaller than" sign. Certainly this is why your software interpreted my post as an HTML message. In the future, I will carefully choose all characters only from the Windows Characters list.

    Let me first try with the degree sign : ° . Did it work this time ? Only when my post is published, can I know for sure ...

    ---

    REFRACTED SEMI-DIAMETERS


    Your definition of a refracted semi-diameter - as I see it - is the angular separation between the point which is the refracted image of the unrefracted center and the point which is the refracted image of an(y) other point on the unrefracted diameter.

    If I keep understanding correctly you consider that the great circle GC1 which joins up both refracted centers is exactly the same as the great circle GC2 joining up the closest two points between both apparent limbs (because a sextant will - or is supposed to at least - measure exactly that angular distance alongside GC2 I would think). And from the sextant measured distance you add-up both refracted semi-diameters computed alongside GC1.

    So, thank you again for your clarification here.

    *******

    ANGULAR VELOCITIES (geocentric vs topocentric)

    Thank you for your check on geocentric velocity. I will check again my value against yours. I probably did not look up in the right data register, since all other results show an excellent match.


    *******

    Thank you again for your reply, and Best Regards

    Antoine


    Antoine M. "Kermit" Couette

    LAST NOTE : Just to be to be sure, and since it was the first time I sent an attachment, did you see and could you read my post on the Cras Plotter [NavList 11145] ? I am just asking because I have not received any comment so far. Still, I do agree that this kind of information does not warrant any kind of lenghty reply.

    --
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList+@fer3.com
       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site