NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/Declination
From: Henry Halboth
Date: 2004 Jun 22, 11:31 -0400
From: Henry Halboth
Date: 2004 Jun 22, 11:31 -0400
I believe you will find that it is the heeling magnet that must be changed end for end when crossing the magnetic equator - neglect of this nicety will adversely affect the magnetic compass. The Flinders Bar is utilized as a soft iron corrector, as are the navigator's balls, for induced magnetism and is itself subject to induced magnetism - no purpose being served by reversing it. The heeling magnet is a permanent magnet and thus may well over-correct if not maintained in proper position. I must confess to having sailed from Artic to Antartic Oceans by magnetic compass and never experienced any problem with tilt on a 7-1/2" card compass mounted in a conventional compensating binnacle, with the heeling magnet reversed on crossing the magnetic equator - please take note that I did not say there was no tilt whatsoever, just that it never was a problem. On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:06:16 +0000 "Trevor J. Kenchington"writes: > Bob Peterson wrote: > > > Back to that world traveler: what are they to do? My > recommendation is > > to purchase additional "cores" for their binnacle compass. Then > as they > > change zones and the card tilt bottoms out and the card binds, > change > > out the "core" to a new zone. In theory, the compass correction > should > > not change, in practice, it does. So best to check it and build a > new > > deviation card. In my book, data always outweighs theory. > > > When I moved to Australia, in the 1980s, I took with me a sighting > compass originally purchased in England (one of the Morin "hockey > puck" > type). It had worked well enough in Nova Scotia but in Tasmania the > card > dipped so far that it was impossible to take bearing sights. I > figured > out that the card must have been balanced for a north-down dip and > was > thrown off by the south-down dip around 45 South latitude. (When I > moved > back to Nova Scotia a few years later, the compass became fully > function > again, so the problem wasn't some sort of breakage of the > instrument.) > > One day when out in the Tasman Sea with nothing better to do, I > mentioned the problem with my compass to our research-ship captain > (who > held a British Master Mariner's ticket) and he initially denied that > there could be any such problem, on the grounds that he had taken > ships > from one hemisphere to the other without their compass cards ever > tilting in response to magnetic dip. Then he relented and said that > there was one vertical magnet in a ship's binnacle (the "Flinders > Bar" > perhaps?) which had to be reversed, end-for-end, when crossing the > Equator and he suggested that maybe that adjustment prevented the > dip > problem that afflicted my sighting compass. > > So ... do big-ship magnetic compasses (still carried as back-up to > their > gyros, so far as I know) dip more than Captain Sheridan realized? Is > there some routine of changing cores when crossing zonal boundaries, > as > Bob suggests, which the captain did so automatically that he had > forgotten its significance when talking to me? Or does a single > adjustment when crossing the Line suffice for a binnacle compass? > > > No doubt the answers are in Bowditch and other textbooks. But > digging > them out of such sources is beyond me just now. > > > Trevor Kenchington > > > -- > Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@iStar.ca > Gadus Associates, Office(902) > 889-9250 > R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) > 889-9251 > Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) > 889-3555 > > Science Serving the Fisheries > http://home.istar.ca/~gadus >