Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Hooke's Quadrant
    From: Kieran Kelly
    Date: 2004 Jan 29, 10:30 +1100

    I have just completed Stephen Inwood's very informative, if a bit long
    winded, "The Man who Knew to Much" the life of the extraordinary English
    scientist Robert Hooke (1635-1703). Very informative on a host of matters. I
    bet few know that the universal joint which sits under your car and connects
    the drive shaft to the transmission (in a rear wheel drive car) was invented
    by Hooke in about 1660 and was first fitted to an Astronomical Quadrant.
    
    Also I had thought previously  that the reflecting quadrant was invented by
    Isaac Newtown and perfected by Hadley and from there it morphed into the
    sextant. Not true. Hooke invented the first reflecting quadrant in 1666 (as
    opposed to the Backstaff Quadrant) and even fitted it with a tangent screw
    as well as coming up with plans for an endless tangent screw. (Peter
    Ifland's excellent "Taking the Stars" gives Hooke his due on page 13, with a
    diagram of his instrument.)
    
    One thing which caught my eye and which I invite comment is the passage in
    the Hooke book which says "Accuracy to one second of arc in a hand held
    instrument was not achieved until the early 1920's, when the Swiss
    instrument designer Heinrich Wild produced the  Wild Universal Theodolite"
    (Page 88). Is this true? Was there never a sextant made before this date
    that could measure to the second? Has there been one made since?  I checked
    a couple of modern sextants which measure respectively:
    
    Plath Classic           1/10 minute              6ss
    Plath Professional      1/10 minute              6ss
    Freiberger Yachtsman    1/60 degree              1 minute
    F M Barker Box Sextant 1/60 degree               1 minute
    (Vernier)
    
    
    Why can't a sextant be graduated to the second? It would simply be a matter
    of scribing the micrometer drum more closely and possibly adding a
    magnifying viewer. Magnifiers were standard on vernier sextants for years.
    Is it because it was considered impractical to go down to a second on a
    hand-held instrument?
    
    Your advice would be appreciated.
    
    Also on a recent post I asked if anyone was aware of sextants being cast in
    bronze other than the Plath Classic and Royal. Why would you cast in bronze?
    What is the advantage over brass?
    
    Regards
    
    
    Kieran Kelly
    Sydney
    Australia
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site