NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: How Worsley Navigated [Was Navigation and Whaling]
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2009 Feb 24, 10:49 -0500
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2009 Feb 24, 10:49 -0500
Gentlemen I have examined the book cover and yes, that appears to be the appropriate ladder sextant. Since it is a painting (and clearly not a photograph, hehehe, like they brought a camera) then we can permit the artist some degree of leniency with regards to the angle of the endless tangent angle adjustment knob. I will check tonight to see if my knob is at the same angle. In regards to reading the vernier, there is a small sheet of translucent glass, mounted perpendicularly to the arc. Its purpose is to diffuse the light over the arc where you are attempting to read it. You hold the light parallel to the arc, not pointed at the arc, rather at the back of the translucent glass. I use a small red LED but I do agree with George's point, it is a little tough to read. Once you get used to it, it isn't so bad. Am I reading it to 10"? I doubt it, but I do take extra-ordinary care to assess the reading. I use the scintillation of the light on the graduations to make the final call and yes, it is always a judgment call. Thanks Bill for the assessment of wear and eccentricity. George makes an excellent point about which sextant. I foolishly assumed he picked the best one available. Maybe it was the only one available! There was discussion about how overloaded the boats were when they journeyed from the ice to Elephant Island. Perhaps they ditched the other sextants, retaining the best one? The logbook does not carry down to seconds when the reduction is performed, only to the nearest minute of degrees. So clearly, he didn't use the terrific accuracy inherent in the sextant. There are two chronometers I have found images of which purport to be the ones used by Worsley. One is the box gimbaled type, while the other is a pocket watch type. I can lend no clarity which one is correct, in particular which one was used on the journey. The log book has a note in the margin which states "Lat proved to be correct within about 2m. Long ditto but Chron was much slower than I had allowed which made us about 20 miles of distance further xxxx than obs showed". Try as I might, I could not read what word he has for xxxx, however, if the chronometer was slower than expected; then NavList can tell me, was that east or west? The chronometer rate determined at Elephant Island was 5 seconds slow per day. I have been contacted by Canterbury Museum. The missing page of the log is on its way! Honorable folks. The page missing clearly contains 4 May, 5 May and 6 May, so some more clarity will be had about the decision making process Worsley entertained, when it arrives. Best Regards Brad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---