NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Index corr. for back sights, was: Octant as dipmeter
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 21, 12:16 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 21, 12:16 -0500
George, I suspect that there are some substantial (mathematical) problems with back sights in general, not just the rigidity of an instrument. All papers on the subject I read yesterday are divided into two categories: a) papers of theorists (like Wollaston, who did not actually sail, and I probably did not experiment with a quadrant) and b) papers of people who actually tried the back sights. Wollaston proposed exactly what I proposed: measuring the dip, and the procedure of back sight index correction. However all who actually tried repeat that this does not work. As a result, they soon gave up the idea of taking back sights. I am trying to understand mathematical reasons of this. I just don't believe that the main obstacle could be in sextant/octant rigidity: they knew very well how to make good instruments. Alex.