NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Integrating marine sextant
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Jun 1, 16:14 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Jun 1, 16:14 -0500
The name under which it is listed is compatible with the Russian label on the box and on the manual: IMS-3. Which I interpret as "Integriruiushchii Morskoi Sextan" (Integrating marine sextant). But of course, other, unexpected interpretations are possible. (I remember how much time and efforts it took to me to decipher the stupid abbreviation SNO-T:-) I am sure the manual contains the explanation of what IMS stands for. And I see no reason for the seller to deceive us and to represent an aircraft sextant as a marine sextant. Its weight is enormous: 12 kg. (With the box and everything inside the box). Are aircraft sextants really so hudge and heavy? Apparently it has some straps to fix it on your shoulders. I have no other evidence. Alex. On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Robert Gainer wrote: > Alex, > Is there anything other then the description on the web site that makes you > think it?s a marine sextant? I think the description might be wrong and this > is just an aircraft unit. > Robert Gainer > > > >From: Alexandre Eremenko> >Reply-To: Navigation Mailing List > >To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM > >Subject: Integrating marine sextant > >Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:50:15 -0500 > > > >Something I've never seen before. > >Apparently a marine sextant modeled > >on an aircraft sextant. > >http://antiques-marine.com/sextants/862/ > > > >Alex. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ >