Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Leap seconds at Big Ben.
    From: Richard M Pisko
    Date: 2009 Feb 01, 14:47 -0700

    On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:54:47 -0700,  wrote:
    
    > But there is much more to precision time keeping than pendulum
    > compensation.
    > For example, variations in the driving force that keeps the pendulum
    > going will result in changes in the length of its arc, as will changes
    > over time in the oil that lubricates the escapement. Variations in
    > atmospheric pressure and air density also set limits to what is
    > achievable. Richard J Matthys' book "Accurate Clock Pendulums" will tell
    > you more than most people will wish to know about the subject.
    
    I have been reading this book for the past few days.  I see my attempt to
    vary the suspension point of the weight, for temperature compensation, was
    crude compared to the shims and tubes of Invar and brass the author tried
    and recorded.
    
    For example, I had not realised there was such a long delay between the
    rod reaching its new length (say to an arbitrary 99 percent), and the
    greater mass of the brass weight coming to the new equilibrium temperature
    by the same percentage.  This leads to a step in accumulated time error,
    even if the temperature compensation is perfect at both temperatures.
     From what I read in his book, an Invar tube inside the lower half of the
    weight, and a brass tube of the proper length below the weight (both over
    the Invar rod) would seem to produce the smallest step.  Does this seem
    reasonable to you?
    
    I was also very surprised by the difference in pendulum rate caused by the
    tightening of the suspension nuts.  Milling a spring and suspension block
     from a solid billet resulted in one of the least sensitive arrangements.
    
    I was also intrigued by the "zero friction" crossed spring suspension,
    although it seems sensitive to the total weight of the pendulum system,
     from the way I read that page or two.
    
    The surface layer effect of the air inside the case causing a change in
    rate was conceptually expected, as was the effect of barometric pressure,
    but I had no idea on the numbers.
    
    Thank you for the recommendation, I'm having fun
    
    --
    Richard . . .
    
    Using Opera 9.2.4 after the "Dog" died
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site