NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lindy Line
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2002 Dec 6, 21:53 +0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2002 Dec 6, 21:53 +0000
Walter Guinon said- >George H has the right idea, Bowditch gives his approach as an approximation to >the shortest distance. Howerver the shortest path, subject to a maximum >Latitude, is given by a GC thru the departure point that is tangent to the >limiting parallel, then along the parallel to another GC thru the destination >point and which is also tangent to the limiting parallel. > >When this approach is studied on a gnomic chart the extension to arbitraty >curves which exclude certain areas (e.g. land) seems clear. > Response from George Huxtable. Yes, Walter is quite right. I have done a bit more pondering and now accept that my approach, even when using a globe-and-string, was still over-simplistic. In my first contribution on this topic I posed this question- "Similarly, when reaching X why not then turn through an angle onto a new great circle between X and Yokohama?" With hindsight, that could never provide a solution to the shortest-path problem. It can never involve a sudden turn through an angle on to a new course, because if one's path involves such a change of course, one can always shorten it a bit further by cutting across, or smoothly rounding, the angle. So it's intuitively obvious that the shortest ship's-path must be a smooth curve with no corners, a condition that's met by choosing an initial great circle (and a final one) that merges smoothly at a tangent into the constant-latitude leg of the course. Just as Walter (and Bill Noyce too) have suggested. In my second mailing, I said- "I had indeed missed something, by ignoring the possibility that under some (but by no means all) circumstances the great-circle path between X and the end-points could take the vessel nearer the pole than X is. Thanks to the others for pointing it out." I suspect that statement too may be inaccurate. Perhaps instead of "under some (but by no means all) circumstances", I should have said "in all circumstances". I'm still pondering about that. The problem is certainly a bit knottier than I first thought. My thanks to the other contributors who have understood it better. We all seem to agree (including Dan) that the procedure quoted by Dan Allen from a website is certainly NOT the best way to do the job. In my 1981 edition of Bowditch vol2, the relevant formulae are listed in art. 1016, "Great-circle sailing by computation, on page 604. George Huxtable. ------------------------------ george@huxtable.u-net.com George Huxtable, 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. Tel. 01865 820222 or (int.) +44 1865 820222. ------------------------------