Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Low Alt Refraction
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2013 Apr 29, 06:23 -0700

    Hello Paul and Marcel,


    This Post in reply to your last 2 posts :

    ******

    To you Paul,

    RE : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Low-Alt-Refraction-Hirose-apr-2013-g23719


    Thanks for specifying a Formula published in the "new" Explanatory Supplement (ES). It shows up as Formula (3.282-2) in the ES 1992 Edition.

    Your remark prompted me into closer searching the "older" (Sep 1977) ES version for any actual information on Refraction at 0° apparent height. Apart from the Standard -34' value used for the SUN and MOON risings and settings, the only additional information in Section 2E is a reference to Chauvenet's "Manual of spherical and practical astronomy" (1960 reprint) and another reference to Smart's "Text-Book on Spherical Astronomy" (1944 reprint).

    In Smarts's Sixth Edition (1977 / 1980 reprint) : again ... apart from the standard -34' refraction value, I fail to see any more specific mention to any Low Altitudes Refraction Values.

    *******

    RE : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Low-Alt-Refraction-Tschudin-apr-2013-g23724

    Hello Marcel,


    First of all, sorry for a few typos which I had mistakenly printed in my post RE : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Low-Alt-Refraction-USCG-Student-Example-for-Low-Altitude-Couëtte-apr-2013-g23718

    Please find here-after a few comments where applicable.

    QUOTE

    Reference #3: The air pressure is given. I do not know what the water
    pressure relates to.

    UNQUOTE

    REPLY : It means "Water Vapor pressure", i.e. Humidity 0%, or Air entirely dry.

    *******

    QUOTE

    Reference #6: Could this have been a typo and the value been in
    degrees, still requiring to add the sun diameter?

    UNQUOTE

    REPLY : This is a typo . Sorry again. This value actually reads - 34.0' which is most probably a simple copy/paste of the Standard -34' value used in the US/UK N.A.'s for SUN/MOON risings/settings.

    *******

    QUOTE

    References #10 and #11: It looks like being the same formula. There
    seems however to be a slight difference. Was #11 not copied correctly?
    (I do not have the original reference.)

    UNQUOTE

    I do not hold a copy of such original formula either ...

    *******

    Best Regards to both of you


    Kermit
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site