NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunar Distance in Wikipedia
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2007 Aug 4, 10:50 -0400
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2007 Aug 4, 10:50 -0400
George, I'm most certainly not asking for an exhaustive coverage of methods of clearing, but rather a general discussion, such as Mendoza's over 100 methods. The need for high precision falls out of the 30- arcminute-per-hour speed of the Moon's passage, plus the 30-arcsecond uncertainty in its calculated position and the 30-arcsecond error in distances observed with a sextant or quadrant, as is already mentioned in the article. The necessity for using 5-figure logs of trig functions then leads to laborious calculations. Any improvement in method that reduced errors, usually by simplifying calculation and reducing table lookups and reducing table size, was then very welcome to mariners during that time, and the large market for clearing tables ensured an abundant variety of same. Because of the prominence of the US Navy's editions of "The American Practical Navigator" and the mention of his lunars in its preface, I believe Americans especially will be interested in the role of Bowditch in the development of lunars, which was to provide a reprint of English clearing tables, with some correction of errors and simplification of calculation. Likewise, I believe many readers will be interested in an explanation of Bruce Stark's tables. This will necessitate presentation of the basic formula for clearing, which would be a good thing in the article, in my opinion. After that, one might as well present the basic Taylor expansion, which was the method used most often. The above is a short outline, very poorly written, of such a discussion. Fred Hebard On Aug 4, 2007, at 5:52 AM, George Huxtable wrote: > I'm not sure what Fred is asking for, but I think he wishes to > include a > discussion of the various procedures for clearing a lunar. I would > resist > that, as it would unbalance the article. I think it was Mendoza who > claimed > to identify over 100 such methods, and that was in the early 1800s! > It may > however be useful, when we get round to the corrections, to simply > say that > many such methods have been developed, and possibly provide a > reference. > Even though it has many shortcomings, I would suggest Charles H > Cotter, A > History of Nautical Astronomy, London 1968, chapter 6. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---