Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Lunars: altitude accuracy
    From: John Karl
    Date: 2010 Sep 12, 10:00 -0700

    Frank,

    I finally got around to thinking about your “Lunars: altitude accuracy” post. Now that I see you’re talking about the effect of error in the moon’s altitude measurement, I derived the same expression you gave,

    dLD = (cos h/ 60 tan LD) dH

    where I’ve taken the moon’s average HP = 57.3’ to get your round number of “60” (which BTW is dimensionless). This only includes the effect of the moon’s parallax -- refraction and augmentation being small in comparison. Under these approximations and using 14-place precision, I compared the errors computed from both the exact equation and the above approximation. For all cases I tried, of LD, Hmoon and Hsun, the above expression was correct to within about 0.002’ of arc – plenty good enough.

    Now from your last post, presumably your expression for error from the sun’s altitude would be

    dLD = (cos h/ 60 sin LD) dH

    But I don’t see how this same factor of “60” would arise because parallax is not an issue here – or do I misunderstand something again??

    Finnally for the P.S.
    Yes of course you’re right about the approximate clearing expression. I only showed the effect of one altitude change on the lunar distance. I find it easier to expand the cos LD instead of LD, and when I include the effects of the altitude changes of both bodies, by expanding the exact result in terms of dh and dH to 2nd order, I get :

    cos LDo = cos LD +
    cos AH cos LD dH + cos Ah cos LD dh +
    cos D dH^2/2 + cosLD dh^2/2 +
    {cos(h + H) cos(h – H)/cos h cos H + tan h tan H cos LD} dh dH

    where h and H are the altitudes of the two bodies. And yes, “I misspoke” about the RBA; cos Ah & cos AH are indeed the “corner cosines” between the LD arc and the adjacent sides, coh and coH, respectively (the co-altitudes). And dh and dH are the small changes in altitudes due to the altitude’s refraction and parallax adjustments. The altitudes h and H are the altitudes of the bodies corrected for everything else, augmentation, semi-diameter, and instrument error.

    Loony in Oshkosh,
    JK

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site