NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunars question for Frank
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Dec 9, 02:40 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Dec 9, 02:40 EST
Bill you asked: "Does your online lunars calculator take phase into account for Venus or other bodies?" No. There is no "obvious" way to do this that is unambiguously correct. Also, if phase is large enough to worry about, you can *see* it (once you know what you're looking for at least). As Venus gets closer to us, take a look at it with your sextant's telescope. If it's approaching one arc-minute in diameter, then through a 7x telescope, it will have an apparent diameter of more han five arc-minutes. That's plenty big enough to resolve with the human eye. You'll actually see a tiny crescent through the sextant. So you should still be able to estimate the location of the planet's center and park that spot right on the lunar limb when you're shooting lunars. And by the way, when in doubt about the size and phase, pull out a little telescope and take a look! Historically, no correction was made for phase. I think that's still appropriate, but John Letcher in his book "Self-Contained Celestial Navigation with H.O. 208", which includes some good info on shooting modern lunars, recommends avoiding Venus and also Mars completely. This is partly because of the phase issue, but more importantly, his simplified method for clearing lunar distance sights could not handle planetary parallax. This is a unique feature of his method, so I don't think it's really necessary to follow that advice. -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars