NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Mirages, was: Refraction
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Jul 16, 21:19 +0000
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Jul 16, 21:19 +0000
Fred Hebard wrote: > I am specifically wondering whether a ship could ever appear to sink > below the horizon even though it actually was above it. My > understanding is that normally ships appear higher than they really > are. Fred, I think you are missing one of the fundamentals of optics. The image of a ship that is created by a mirage, like the image of your face when you look in a mirror, does not exist at the point where you think you see it. Technically, it is a "virtual image". [Other optical systems do create images where we think we see them -- a slide projector, for example, does create an image, which we can see if we place a screen at the right place (or else twiddle the focus knob on the projector to move the image to where we had already placed the screen).] Since the image is a virtual one, it cannot sink _behind_ the horizon because it doesn't actually exist anywhere near the horizon. What is happening is that light rays heading away from the ship are bent (by refraction) and eventually reach your eye while heading upwards (assuming cold air over hot water -- or more realistically hot land). Your eye/brain system then interprets those rising rays as coming from an object below the horizon but nearer to you than the horizon. And that is the conventional type of mirage, familiar in hot deserts. [We usually think of such a mirage in terms of seeing an image of the sky which resembles a lake. However, while driving down the highway here in Nova Scotia a few days ago, I saw clear images of on-coming vehicles and even the yellow line down the centre of the road on the next upward slope. (Nova Scotia gets strong sunshine and cold air, giving us well-developed mirages quite often.)] You earlier wrote: > I am trying to get at the question of objects located on earth, or > near, rather than stars. Both of your examples, low and high latitude, > appear to involve the image being located above its source. I am > wonder whether there are any examples of the source of an image being > on top. (In the case of light reflected off ice, I would consider the > point of reflection to be the source). But I may have a very poor > understanding of desert mirages. The above anecdote should answer the point about objects on Earth. The low-latitude, cold-air-over-hot-land type of mirage (the commonest type) does not place the image above the object but below it, as with sky being seen apparently on the ground. Aside from situations where you might see the Sun reflected as in a mirror, light reflection from ice just makes the ice look bright white. That doesn't involve refraction or a mirage. However, in Arctic conditions, the reflected light which heads obliquely upwards can then be refracted such that it comes back down again. The observer whose eyes receive those downward-tending rays will perceive the brightness of the ice as being in the sky, where the light rays appear to be coming from. That, as best as I understand it, is ice blink. Finally: The only way for a mirage to cause the horizon to obscure a ship, if that is what you are asking, would be for a warm-air-over-cold-ocean type of mirage to raise an image of the ocean surface into the sky, confusing the outline of a ship (likely one hull-down over your horizon). I haven't heard reports of that happening but I don't see why it wouldn't under some conditions. Trevor Kenchington -- Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@iStar.ca Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250 R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251 Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555 Science Serving the Fisheries http://home.istar.ca/~gadus