NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
MkIXa vs SNO-T
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Feb 15, 19:16 -0800
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Feb 15, 19:16 -0800
1. February 15, 16LT Sun altitude SNO-T art horizon, Caro syrup+oil: IC=-0.5, Errors: 0.8, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, -0.2, 0.3, 0.0, 0.2. Average error: 0.18, sigma=0.3 2. Same, MkIXa, no averaging. Errors: -3.6, -4.3, -3.7, -4.8, -3.6, -1.4, -3.2, 6.8, -0.6, 5.2 Average error: -1.22, sigma=4'.0 (You can notice the switch from negative to positive errors after the 7-th observation. This happened when I had to push the "increase knob". So there might be some instrumental error related to this knob action.) 3. Now averager is on: GMT: 21:25:45 (end of observation) sextant reading: 19d16', error 1'.7 4. February 16 (GMT date), Sirius altitude, MkIXa, no averager: GMT: Alt: Error: 2:04:55 31d57' -0.4 2:07:10 31d54' -4.0 2:09:25 32d05' 1.7 2:10:45 32d09' 2.7 2:12:00 32d13' 4.0 Average error: 0'.8, sigma=3' 5. Averager is on (Sirius): GMT=2:20:10, alt=32d24, Error 0.93. These results are more typical than the one I posted first. I mean 4-6 minutes errors frequently happen in individual observations. They are usually canceled by averaging, manual or automatic. I suppose that the first observation I posted two days ago was so good by pure coincidence. Alex. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---