Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Navigation exercise
    From: Jeremy C
    Date: 2008 May 17, 01:35 -0700

        Thank you for those who tried the problem.  I will take heed of the
    advice Peter offered and try to remember to give date in a more
    universal format.
        I hesitate to work problems out for two major reasons: 1) there are
    many methods of sight reduction and I really don�t have the time to
    demonstrate more than one, and 2) the books I use are quite
    �American� (i.e. HO 249, HO 229, American Practical Navigator) and I
    am not sure what publications other members may use.  Of course all
    information can be calculated in short order with computers and
    calculators.
        My reductions at sea are usually performed with a navigation software
    package called �SkyMate Pro,� which is available as shareware online.
    It is incredibly easy to use and can reduce sights from GPS positions
    without using assumed position reductions as is typical with tables
    and paper.  I am, however, well versed in nearly every reduction using
    the standard US government tables.  My reduction paradigms are similar
    to the US Coast Guard methods as these were the ones I was taught, and
    was tested on in my Merchant Marine Officer examinations.  I will be
    using these methods in my solutions to the problems I offer up to the
    list.
    The first problem was a LAN latitude line from a ship drifting at sea
    (no sailings are needed).  Part �A� asked for a time of LAN,
    approximate sextant altitude, and AZ of the sun.  This information is
    useful to the navigator at sea so that he is looking in the right
    place at the right time for the body.
        The time of LAN is usually calculated by either the GHA method or the
    Equation of Time method.  I prefer the GHA method as it has always
    been easier for me to work.  Our longitude at noon was 145 deg 40�
    East.  This equates to a GHA of 214 deg 20� (180+ (180-145 d 40�)).
    Looking in the nautical almanac, the GHA of the sun that was the
    closest, and less then,  214 deg was 02h00m with a GHA of 210 deg
    54.5�.  When you find the difference of these two angles you get 3 deg
    25.5�.  Enter the �arc to time� table in the nautical almanac and you
    get 13min 42 seconds.  Since we are keeping ZD -10, add 10 hours to
    0200 and then add the 13-42 seconds.  This will give us a local zone
    time of 12h 13m 42s which is the time of LAN.
        The declination of the sun at 1200 hrs local zone time on 16 May 08
    (0200 UTC) is 19 deg 09.5� North.  Since this is the same name, but a
    greater number then our assumed Latitude, the sun will bear North (no
    need to calculate this to the minute, you are just looking to see what
    general bearing the sun will be, this is especially important with
    high altitude sights where the azimuth of the body can be hard to tell
    from inspection).  Given the location of the sun in relationship to
    the ship and the equator, we can see that the sun�s declination minus
    the zenith distance (90-Ho) will give us Latitude.  Using a bit of
    algebra we can see that the approximate Hs will be 90-(Dec-Lat).  So
    90-(19.1-15.2)= 86.1 degrees or 86 deg 6 minutes on the sextant.
        I shot the sun at 12 hr 13m 40 sec as I observed start to descend
    from its highest altitude.  My Hs was 85 deg 59.0 minutes.  I then
    plugged this number into my standard Hs to Ho format (you can
    disregard temp and pressure in this case since the correction is 0).
    Hs  85-59.0
    IC 00-00.8 (off the arc so it is positive)
    Dip -00-09.9 (106 feet is nearly 10 minutes of correction!  Found in
    the nautical almanac)
    Ha 85-05.7
    Body 00-15.8 (lower limb sight, remember to use the correct column for
    May)
    Ho 86-05.7
    
    We now determine the declination at the time of sight.  Since 13min 40
    seconds past since the time of the sight, we need to go to the back of
    the almanac and find that time in the increments and corrections
    section.  We find a correction of +0.1 since the declination is
    increasing by the hour at a rate of 0.6� per hour.  This gives our
    declination at the time of the sight of 19 deg 09.6� North
        Again since we have the sun in the same hemisphere and its
    declination is greater then our latitude, then we need to subtract
    zenith distance from declination to find latitude.  Simply put Dec-(90-
    Ho)= Latitude North.  19d 09.6�-(90-86 deg 05.7�)= 15 deg 15.3�
    North.  This sight was 1.3 miles north of the actual latitude of 15
    deg 14.0� North.
    JCA
    
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site