NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Greg Rudzinski
Date: 2012 Apr 30, 21:13 -0700
Alex,
"T" is Toward
"A" is Away
The spread or scatter difference between the two sets of 30 observations is 0.6' (2.7' - 2.1') therefor +/- 0.3' will be the improved benefit of the preset on expected max error for any individual observation.
You will have to examine a U.S. Navy MK 5 bubble octant to get a better idea of what I'm trying to do. The micrometer drum on the MK 5 is only marked in even minutes. The whole point of this exercise is to overcome the inaccuracy caused by having just the even minutes of arc unlike a marine sextant which has the micrometer drum marked every minute plus a scale to determine tenths.
Yes the observations were made from the beach using the natural horizon. There is no way to get results like I did with a bubble horizon even on my luckiest day ;-)
Yes you are correct in that there is no difference but only when averaging multiple observations. I,m interested in the possible error for a single observation.
I was happy to get near marine sextant performance which means that this particular octant with horizon prism is good enough to substitute for a marine sextant aboard ship or small craft.
Greg Rudzinski
[NavList] Re: Navy MK 5 Octant Using Natural Horizon
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 30 Apr 2012 19:57
Greg,
There is something I don't understand in your messag:
> Preset micrometer- Intercept average 0.2' T with spread
> (scatter) of 2.1' moa.
What does the letter "T" mean after the 0.2' ?
> Normal set micrometer- Intercept average 0.1' A with spread of 2.7' moa.
What does the letter "A" mean after the 0.1'
"Intercept average" means the "average error", correct?
> Conclusions:
>
> A small improvement (+/- 0.3' moa) for single
> observations can be realized by presetting the Navy MK 5 micrometer drum
> to the even minute then waiting for horizon tangency.
I don't see how your data imply this conclusion:-)
I would interpret your data as showing that "there is no difference"
whether you preset or not.
And the last question: why do you have to preset to even minute?
Why not to odd?
The observations were made from land, I supose, and with natural horizon,
correct?
Alex.
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------