NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: One-body fix
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2009 Apr 27, 15:58 +0100
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2009 Apr 27, 15:58 +0100
Peter Hakel asked- "Nevertheless, I would like to know just how accurately one can measure azimuth in the field/ocean and what portable devices (besides compasses), are available for this (if any)." Even under benign conditions, I wouldn't trust any compass on a small vessel, carefully corrected as necessary for variation and deviation, to indicate true North as a reference to any better than one degree either way. I can't say whether the gyro-compass on a big ship would do much better than that (but rather doubt it...). I doubt if Peter Hakel's suggestion of navigating by altitude and azimuth of a body has much potential. Geoffrey Kolbe has pointed out some pitfalls already. For each degree, measured down from the zenith, of a body, an uncertainty of 1 degree in azimuth would give rise to an error in deduced position of about a mile, roughly speaking. From that point of view, high altitudes would be better. However, it's only possible to assess the azimuth of bodies near the horizon with any accuracy. Higher altitudes would call for a sighting device on a stabilised mounting, which was kept accurately horizontal. Such a platform might exist on a big ship, however. George. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---