Re: Pre-computed Altitudes and Azimuths
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2009 Dec 20, 04:24 -0800
Two of the attachments went off to a archive somewhere and can't be accessed so I am attaching a second copy.
--- On Sun, 12/20/09, glapook@PACBELL.NET <glapook@PACBELL.NET> wrote:
From: glapook@PACBELL.NET <glapook@PACBELL.NET> Subject: Re: [NavList 11291] Pre-computed Altitudes and Azimuths To: NavList@fer3.com Date: Sunday, December 20, 2009, 4:11 AM
That's a good idea. Another way to do the computation is to just compute data for every twenty minutes and then plot a graph of the points. The graph allows you to pick off data for intermediate times. To make determining the intercept even quicker you can apply the sextant corrections with the sign reversed to the Hc to
determine precomputed altitude, Hp to put in your table or on a graph.. Then you can compare the raw sextant altitude to Hp and determine the intercept. I am attaching some reference works on this subject. In flight navigation you plan the time of the sights and take them on time like you did. When I was taking a lot of sights to determine the accuracy of an artificial horizon I tuned my radio to WWV and took the sights on the minute beep, works real well for a series of sights. It is easy to take a sight a minute, sixty in an hour. http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/NIF-Landfall.pdf gl
File:
File:
--
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList+@fer3.com
|
--
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList+@fer3.com
File:
File: