NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Precomputed lunar distances
From: Bill B
Date: 2005 Apr 17, 19:04 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2005 Apr 17, 19:04 -0500
Fred wrote: > Refraction is critical to clearing both interstellar and lunar > distances. The mistake Bauer made in the table in his book is that he > did not account for refraction. That, of course, would not be possible > without knowing one's position. I have a second edition paperback of Bauer's "The Sextant Handbook," circa 1995. Appendix F deals with interstellar angles. It would appear the first three paragraphs have been revised, as the type is darker than the later paragraphs. This is noticeable throughout the book when a few lines have been changed. In the revised paragraphs he does mention that refraction must be accounted for, bur his method is simplistic. Take the difference between the two object's refraction and subtract from calculated true separation. While it works for stars at the same azimuth, it falls apart in other situations. A few tenths of a minute off is not, IMHO, acceptable for establishing error along the arc or lunars, where 0.2' off becomes 6' in latitude. Bill