Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Raw data for bubble
    From: Bill Noyce
    Date: 2007 Mar 12, 22:15 -0400

    I'll take a shot at answering some of Bill's questions...
    
    The "magic number" 0.2724 isn't an angle, it's simply the ratio
       moon_radius / earth_radius
    SD is the angular distance of the moon's radius as seen from the
    earth, and similarly HP=SD/0.2724 is the angular distance of the
    earth's radius as seen from the moon, which is another way of
    describing the parallax of the moon at the horizon.  When we're on the
    line from the center of the earth to the moon, parallax is zero (and
    Ho=90 degrees).  For intermediate cases, cos(Ho) represents how far
    from that centerline we are, and thus how much of the HP to include.
    
    Augmentation reaches a maximum of about 0.3' and is caused simply by
    being closer to the moon when it's overhead because the earth is a
    sphere.  The ideal formula would involve tangents, and the ratio of
    the earth's radius to the moon's orbital distance, but this ratio is
    so small we can approximate tan(x)=x (when x is in radians).  sin(Ho)
    represents how much closer to the moon we are than the center of the
    earth is; it's zero when the moon is on the horizon, and 1 when it's
    overhead.  So the formula ends up something like
      aug = tiny_number*sin(Ho)*SD, where tiny_number is something like 0.005
    For most practical purposes, you can cut a lot of corners, and simply say
      Ho(degrees)   augmentation
         <10 . . . . . . 0.0'
        10-30  . . . . . 0.1'
        30-56  . . . . . 0.2'
        56-90  . . . . . 0.3'
    This neglects the fact that augmentation will be slightly more when SD
    is greater, or less when SD is less.  I believe that this kind of
    "constant augmentation" is built into the "moon correction" tables in
    the NA.
    
    I'm pretty sure the NA doesn't try to account for the effect of
    oblateness.  It would affect parallax a tiny bit, and augmentation an
    entirely negligible amount, I believe.
    
        -- Bill N.
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site