Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distances
    From: Trevor Kenchington
    Date: 2004 Jan 1, 12:26 +0000

    Fred & Jan,
    
    With apologies for butting into your exchange but you two seem to be
    misunderstanding one another:
    
    Fred: What you are suggesting is, I think, a paired-comparison t-test of
    the null hypothesis that the mean of all possible positions estimated by
    lunars is not different from the mean of all possible positions
    estimated by chronometer, using a sample of paired position estimates,
    one each by lunar and chronometer (where, of course, each "estimate" is
    actually based on multiple sextant observations on the same day). That
    would be one way to see whether there was a bias in the lunar estimates
    of position but it would not address Jan's interest in the average
    absolute magnitude of the differences between the lunar and chronometer
    estimates.
    
    For that, Jan already has someone else's estimate of the "probable
    error", meaning the absolute difference that will be exceeded by 50% of
    paired position estimates (on average). To get from that value to the
    standard deviation of the errors in the lunars, he has assumed that the
    chronometer positions are exact (which is likely close enough to the
    truth) and has consulted the percentage points of the _Normal_
    distribution, _not_ the t-distribution which you turned to. Armed with
    the standard deviation, he has again turned to the Normal distribution
    to read off the error that should occur in 3 estimates in every thousand
    (i.e. 1-0.997 = 0.003 of lunar estimates).
    
    
    The problem with that, as I have noted in earlier messages, is that the
    errors in the lunars are unlikely to be exactly Normally distributed.
    Otherwise, I think that Jan has followed the right path in trying to
    estimate the magnitude of the errors that a skilled navigator might get
    with lunars. He doesn't need hypothesis testing and hence he does not
    need the t or F distributions.
    
    
    Trevor Kenchington
    
    
    --
    Trevor J. Kenchington PhD                         Gadus@iStar.ca
    Gadus Associates,                                 Office(902) 889-9250
    R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour,                     Fax   (902) 889-9251
    Nova Scotia  B0J 2L0, CANADA                      Home  (902) 889-3555
    
                         Science Serving the Fisheries
                          http://home.istar.ca/~gadus
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site