NavList:

   

Reply

Refering to:
> "With the help of a parser and Excel it should also  be
> possible to arrive at monthly averages."

Frank wrote
> Well, sure... if you  really think that's a good idea! I think you might
> possibly be better off facing  up to the variabiilty of the troposphere as
> inescapable noise in any refraction  table.

I am still try to find a good solution to provide reasonable good guesses
for refraction values (also) at low altitudes for any point on the globe.
From what I noticed there are differences to expect - even on averaged
data - depending on the latitude (arctical/antarctical troposphere,
tropical/aequatorial troposphere and moderate altitude troposphere) and last
but not least also depending on the seasons (summer/winter).

Frank wrote further
> LOL. I am opening an employment agency for out-of-work  astronomical
> calculators next week. ;-) I would include an attachment on the  subject,
> but, well,
> some people might take it the wrong way, if you know what I  mean...

I guess your workshop of lunars will be part of it ;-)

Frank also wrote
> I will be travelling for a few days and possibly unable to answer e-mail
> during that time. Talk to you soon.

Don't meet "Catrina"!
Refering to "talk", yes, that also could be possible, e.g. via Skype...

Marcel

   

Reply