NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Refraction
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Aug 4, 16:01 EDT
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Aug 4, 16:01 EDT
Marcel you wrote:
"The self-made program contains also a goographical database with
the
coordinates of about half million locations and mountains and from the
mountains also their altitude. In addition I incorporated recently a
atmospheric model for approximate temperature and pressure values for a
given location at a given day and time... "
coordinates of about half million locations and mountains and from the
mountains also their altitude. In addition I incorporated recently a
atmospheric model for approximate temperature and pressure values for a
given location at a given day and time... "
The numerical integration for this is neither especially difficult nor
time-consuming: divide the atmosphere up into thin layers of varying density and
apply the usual law of refraction at each step. Assuming your goal is to create
accurate simulated views of landscapes (is it??), that's probably the best way
to proceed. Then you can include as much detail as you want --temperature
inversions, pressure gradients, anything-- and you can calculate extinction at
the same time. As a check on your results, you can compare against the standard
tabulated refraction values.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars