NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Refraction at the horizon.
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Mar 15, 23:23 -0400
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Mar 15, 23:23 -0400
Marcel, you wrote: "My suggestion would be that one measures the temperature of the water and of the air. If this temperature difference is "considerable", extreme refractions may be likely. Unfortunately I'm not in a position to quantify the "considerable". From my own experience at my present location these effects are more likely during spring and autumn. In spring the water is still cold from winter and the air may already be warm; this leads at the surface to inversions with ducting. In autumn the sea is still warm from summer and the air already cold; this leads to "Omega" sunsets or inferior mirages." This was tried out in the late 19th/early 20th centuries, primarily for reducing dip anomalies. It seems that in practice it wasn't sufficiently predictive. I would imagine there are formal papers on the results of these experiments from a century ago, but I haven't seen any. Here's a brief extract from Chauvenet who discussed this possibility: "For an altitude of a few feet, the difference of pressure will not sensibly affect the value of D', and may be disregarded, especially since a very precise determination of the dip is not possible unless we know the density of the air at the visible horizon, which cannot usually be observed. We may, however, assume the temperature of the water to be that of the lowest stratum of the air" -FER --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---