NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: SNO-T tests
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Nov 30, 10:00 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Nov 30, 10:00 -0500
Ken, Thanks! That's a very interesting suggestion: to try to make a correction table where the correction depends on the minute reading, rather than degree. On the next sunny (and Moony:-) day I will try to do this. (I find that in general my Sun-Moon measurements are much more precise than the measurements at night, which is not surprising). Alex. On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ken Gebhart wrote: > On 11/28/05 1:09 PM, "Fred Hebard"wrote: > > > On Nov 28, 2005, at 1:00 PM, Alexandre E Eremenko wrote: > > > >>> For instance, the bump at 16 > >>> degrees wasn't > >>> reproducible between November 13 and November 7. > >> > >> That's the main problem. If they were reproducible, I'd > >> make a table of arc correction. But they are not, and I am stilll > >> at loss whether this has something to do with my observations > >> or just the sextant is flimsy. > >> > >> Alex. > > > > > > Alex, > > > > My guess would be observational proficiency. It took me about two > > years to achieve proficiency in altitude shots with the artificial > > horizon; I quickly got within 0.5' of arc, but getting well under > > 0.2' took much longer. You seem to be pretty close. Perhaps Frank > > could comment on how long it took him. > > > > Fred > > > Gentlemen, > > I have been paying occasional attention to your posts (due to travels), and > it seems to me that you are neglecting the effect of drum eccentricity. The > readings of the micrometer drum itself can be in error by as much as 20 or > 30" of arc all by itself. This is caused by any microscopic deformation of > the drum shaft, or errors in machining (or damage to) the worm gear. This > can be added (plus or minus) to any errors determined on the arc. This will > pretty much make a mess of any attempts to calibrate the arc unless all > measurements are made at the same drum reading (not likely when measuring > stellar distances). > > It seems to me that a way to get a handle on your own drum eccentricity > might be to measure a moon- star distance over a period of about 2 hours. > This should give a series of readings over a complete revolution of the > drum, that could be plotted of graph paper to see what is happening. > Ken >