Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: SNO-T tests
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2005 Nov 30, 10:00 -0500

    Ken,
    Thanks! That's a very interesting suggestion:
    to try to make a correction table where the correction
    depends on the minute reading, rather than degree.
    On the next sunny (and Moony:-) day I will try to do this.
    (I find that in general my Sun-Moon measurements are much more
    precise than the measurements at night, which is not surprising).
    
    Alex.
    
    On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ken Gebhart wrote:
    
    > On 11/28/05 1:09 PM, "Fred Hebard"  wrote:
    >
    > > On Nov 28, 2005, at 1:00 PM, Alexandre E Eremenko wrote:
    > >
    > >>> For instance, the bump at 16
    > >>> degrees wasn't
    > >>> reproducible between November 13 and November 7.
    > >>
    > >> That's the main problem. If they were reproducible, I'd
    > >> make a table of arc correction. But they are not, and I am stilll
    > >> at loss whether this has something to do with my observations
    > >> or just the sextant is flimsy.
    > >>
    > >> Alex.
    > >
    > >
    > > Alex,
    > >
    > > My guess would be observational proficiency.  It took me about two
    > > years to achieve proficiency in altitude shots with the artificial
    > > horizon; I quickly got within 0.5' of arc, but getting well under
    > > 0.2' took much longer.  You seem to be pretty close.  Perhaps Frank
    > > could comment on how long it took him.
    > >
    > > Fred
    > >
    > Gentlemen,
    >
    > I have been paying occasional attention to your posts (due to travels), and
    > it seems to me that you are neglecting the effect of drum eccentricity.  The
    > readings of the micrometer drum itself can be in error by as much as 20 or
    > 30" of arc all by itself. This is caused by any microscopic deformation of
    > the drum shaft, or errors in machining (or damage to) the worm gear. This
    > can be added (plus or minus) to any errors determined on the arc.  This will
    > pretty much make a mess of any attempts to calibrate the arc unless all
    > measurements are made at the same drum reading (not likely when measuring
    > stellar distances).
    >
    > It seems to me that a way to get a handle on your own drum eccentricity
    > might be to measure a moon- star distance over a period of about 2 hours.
    > This should give a series of readings over a complete revolution of the
    > drum, that could be plotted of graph paper to see what is happening.
    > Ken
    >
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site