Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Semi-diameter in the Nautical Almanac
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2009 Dec 15, 00:50 -0800

    We are all familiar with the semi-diameter of the sun and of the moon
    being tabulated on each of the daily pages of the Nautical Almanac. My
    question is "why?" There is no place where you use this bit of
    information when using the N.A. This information would be useful if the
    sextant corrections were made separately but both the moon and sun
    correction tables in the N.A. combine  semi-diameter with the refraction
    and parallax in altitude corrections in just one table so there is no
    place to input the S.D. There has not always been a listing of S.D. for
    the sun, see the attached page from the 1937 N.A.
    
    I am also curious why the sun correction table has only two tabulations
    allowing for only two S.D. values when the S.D. of the sun includes six
    different values during the year from15.8 to 16.3 minutes. This
    unnecessarily limits the accuracy of the sun corrections. The horizontal
    parallax of the sun is 8.8 seconds or just slightly less than .15
    minutes. Looking at the sextant correction table for the sun for an
    altitude of zero degrees for October to March we find a value for the
    lower limb of -18.2'. This includes the refraction correction of -34.5'
    and the horizontal parallax of .15'. So by backing out these value we
    can see that the semi-diameter used for this correction table is 16.15'
    while the S.D during this period includes four values from 16.0' to
    16.3' building in up to a .15' error. For the period of April to
    September the S.D. varies form 15.8' to 16.0' but the S.D. used in the
    correction table is 15.95' also building in an error up to .15'.
    
    So using the sun's actual S.D. with the refraction table for stars
    should produce better accuracy but then you have to account for the
    sun's parallax in altitude. A separate table for the sun's parallax in
    altitude would be quite simple. To an accuracy of .1' the sun's
    horizontal parallax of 8.8 seconds rounds down to .1'. Since the
    parallax in altitude varies with the cosine of the altitude the parallax
    in altitude table, to .1' precision, would show .1' for altitudes of
    zero to 70 degrees and zero minutes above 70 degrees.
    
    Frank seems to be an expert on the N.A. maybe he can explain  this.
    
    gl
    
    --
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList+@fer3.com
    
    

    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site