NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant Accuracy from new member
From: dpstephen
Date: 2003 Mar 18, 09:35 -0700
From: dpstephen
Date: 2003 Mar 18, 09:35 -0700
Hello all, I have been lurking for a long time here and will finally participate. I do a fair amount of celestial nav stuff, almost all from land. Use an Astra IIIb, pocket sextant, liquid and mirror artificial horizons and theodolites (Wild T-2, old K&E Paragon and Kern DKM-1). At my high elevation barometric pressure can have a significant influence on refraction but another large influence here is deflection of the vertical. I understand this can be as large as about 1' and where I live causes an E-W error of 29" and a north south error of 1". I live right on the edge of the rocky mountains thus the large deflection. As I understand it, if I did everything perfectly, observation, refraction, parallax (if needed), augmentation (if needed), calculations, perfect tables,... I would still be off by 29" (about 2900 feet) due to deflection of the vertical. With the Wild T-2 theodolite (measures to 1") the readings I get are consistently about 1/2 mile in error to the east but quite a bit better north and south. With the T-2 the big deal is trying to get a really accurate time. There are free programs on the internet that will allow you to calculate the deflection at any location. Doug Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Hebard"To: Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:12 PM Subject: Re: Sextant Accuracy > I don't know that I'm not too upset by recent war-precipitating events > to respond well, but here goes. Perhaps we can find rational refuge in > our abstruse meanderings about an _almost_ obsolete technology. > > It was very gratifying to hear from our professional sea officer, Doug > Royer. I might imagine that my attempt to get as accurate as possible > is related to his comments about real-world conditions. I also wonder > how close the winner of one of those jackpots generally was to the GPS > position? I recall our correspondent from the arctic saying his shots > were within 0.2', and Bowditch saying that an experienced observer > could shoot to 0.1'. I doubt I'll ever get to the level of experience > to which Bowditch refers, which I would expect comes from taking rounds > of shots five times a day or more. >