NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant calibration
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2013 Dec 17, 18:05 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2013 Dec 17, 18:05 -0500
Brad, > Has anyone ever matched the results published on their certificate from a > calibration facility while using star to star distances? Open call: > Anyone? Exactly the same challenge was posted on this list more than 10 years ago (by Frank, if I remember correctly). To my knowledge nobody on this list ever claimed that s/he could do this. Alex. > Brad > On Dec 17, 2013 2:44 PM, "G Becker"wrote: > >> ------------------------------ >> >> I agree. When shooting Polaris in the daylight (not with a sextant) it >> reduces to a distinct tiny white pinpoint, it disappears behind the >> crosshairs. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> *From:* NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter >> Monta >> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:10 PM >> *To:* george{at}gwbeckerpls.com >> *Subject:* [NavList] Re: Sextant calibration >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Hi Brad, >> >> Rather than distinct points, stars are fuzzy blobs. >> >> >> >> It might help to illuminate the entire field with some background >> light---that way the overall contrast of the scene would be reduced, so >> that the eye would see just the bright cores of the stars against a grey >> background. Start with no light, acquire the blobs in the field of >> view, >> then gradually turn up the light source until the stars are maximally >> pointlike, but not so much that they're not easily trackable by eye as >> the >> sextant is swung and adjusted. >> >> The few times I've looked at Venus during the day with binoculars, I've >> been struck with how pointlike it seems against the blue sky. >> >> >> >> I have some camera images of star-star sights---they don't show the >> "fuzzy >> blobs" problem provided the exposure doesn't saturate the stars. At >> some >> point I hope to finish the job of estimating my sextant's arc error >> using >> these images. >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >> : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=125795 >> >> : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=125796 >> > > > : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=125798 > > > >