NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant calibration in the workshop
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2008 Jan 13, 20:49 -0500
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2008 Jan 13, 20:49 -0500
I was busy with finishing procrastinated work when that very nice post came by, and didn't comment. Thanks to Frank for resuscitating it. I'd just like to comment on one thing regarding these determinations of sextant error at fixed intervals along the arc. One would expect that some smoothly varying curve passing through the points would describe the errors, so that one could interpolate between points to estimate an error. Unfortunately, this may not necessarily be so. This became obvious to me on EBay in inspecting some certificates issued to late-model Hughes sextants by the British Navy that showed a continuous curve. I don't recall the methadology used to generate the curves, if it was listed. The curves were all over the place with substantial peaks and valleys occurring between fixed points. This, of course would be less of a problem with error determinations at 15d intervals than 30d intervals, but is still a potential problem. Perhaps Mr. Morris will poke around with his calibration machine to test this hypothesis. I would think the high end of the MkII scale would be a fruitful starting location. I'd also be curious to learn Mr. Morris' opinion of by how much one must undershoot a reading to reload the thrust bearing at the reading. Fred Hebard On Jan 13, 2008, at 7:21 PM, frankreed@HistoricalAtlas.net wrote: > > Two weeks ago, Bill Morris wrote about calibrating his sextants. >> >> >> "My 1981 instrument meets Alex's specification but not mine: 15d. >> +1"; 30d >> +1"; 45d +4"; 60d +7"; 75d +8"; 90d +11"; 105d +9"; 120d +8"." >> >> That's excellent. >> >> "My Mk II s/n 14176, 1942 in near-new condition with a certificate >> from Long >> Beach Shipyard dated 7 January 1986, does well too, except above >> 90 degrees. >> I give the original certificate figures followed in brackets by my >> own, >> which are each based on the mean of three careful readings: 15d >> +3"(+1"); >> 30d -14"(-12"); 45d -17"(-16'); 60d -25"(-22"); 75d -30"(-31"); 90d >> -33"(-40"); 105d -12"(-31"); 120d 0"(-30"). For most practical >> purposes >> except lunars, the differences are insignificant." >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---