NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Star Identification
From: R B Emerson
Date: 2008 Jul 30, 15:49 -0400
From: R B Emerson
Date: 2008 Jul 30, 15:49 -0400
Er, but there are times when
the clouds part long enough to give a couple of shots of "some star",
no matter how carefully one pre-computes altitudes and azimuths. Maybe
the LOP crossing angle reeks and it's all less than satisfactory but if
it's that or sticking with an old and questionable DR EP, I'll take the
sights and be glad of them. Even if I do view them with some caution.
Rick Emerson
"I'd like to live in Theory. Everything works there." - - Anonymous
Greg R. wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rick Emerson
"I'd like to live in Theory. Everything works there." - - Anonymous
Greg R. wrote:
--- bruce hamilton <bruce.hamilton@shaw.ca> wrote:Last night, I could get a reading from a single star through a single whole in the clouds. My star identification skills are still poor, and those circumstances were beyond me. Is there a quick and dirty way to take that single observation and find what star I was looking at using the observation, an Almanac a watch and calculator?Not to criticize your technique here (and if it works for what you want to do, there's certainly nothing wrong with that...), but you're almost going about it "backwards". Usually you'll pre-compute elevations and azimuths of stars *before* doing the sights, and then point the sextant accordingly (it's usually pretty obvious what star you're looking for, just look for the brightest object in the sextant's field of view... ;-)). Vol. 1 of Pub. 249 works really good for this - they've already done the hard work for you, all you need is LHA Aries for the time of the sights. From that it gives you a group of seven stars pre-selected for your shooting pleasure - even has the 3 that give the best "cut" for a fix marked with diamonds, and 1st magnitude stars are listed in ALL CAPS. -- GregR --- bruce hamilton <bruce.hamilton@shaw.ca> wrote:I just received an A-10 that I got for cheap on E-bay. Well, most of one as is is missing the averaging mechanism, but as I plan to use it with my feet firmly planted on the ground, I don't need that bit. I also managed to coax a bubble out of it too. I must say that it is the best thing for us urban dwellers with no horizon handy. I might get a calibrated A-12 next as I love the concept. Put the body in the center of the bubble and I have a reading. Very nice! I am a bubble sextant fan now. I have one question for someone who has used one (A-10) before. What is the use of the frosted glass that swings over the top of the bubble column? Mine has some faint lines on it, but it seems to me that if the body is in the bubble, no other reference is needed. As well, it seems to me if I peek to the left of the view, I could see a natural horizon, if I had one. Is this possible or a pipe dream? Another question. Last night, I could get a reading from a single star through a single whole in the clouds. My star identification skills are still poor, and those circumstances were beyond me. Is there a quick and dirty way to take that single observation and find what star I was looking at using the observation, an Almanac a watch and calculator? I think I found the star in the site plan section of Celest Nav on my palm pilot, but I would like to be able to do it without. Thank You Bruce Hamilton Vancouver, BC
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---