NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Star Identification
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2008 Jul 30, 14:14 EDT
Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2008 Jul 30, 14:14 EDT
Greg wrote:
Usually you'll pre-compute elevations and azimuths of stars
*before*
doing the sights, and then point the sextant accordingly (it's usually
pretty obvious what star you're looking for, just look for the
brightest object in the sextant's field of view... ;-)).
doing the sights, and then point the sextant accordingly (it's usually
pretty obvious what star you're looking for, just look for the
brightest object in the sextant's field of view... ;-)).
=================
This is correct, except when the cloud cover doesn't cooperate with the
pre-computed stars and you are left shooting whatever you can see. I have
had this happen several times at sea, when the only stars I could shoot were
none of the ones I wanted to shoot.
To combat this, I recorded the approximate azimuth as well as
altitude. Fortunately I was still shooting major stars and was able to
find them on my star finder. If they had been minor stars, I probably
would have taken the easy way out and just not reduced them (this was all before
I had computers for this kind of work).
JCA
Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---