Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Star - Star Observations
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2010 Mar 11, 14:33 -0000

    Some comments about Douglas' latest posting.
    
    The initial question was posed by Brad Morris, not Bill Morris.
    
    Douglas asked-
    
    "You queried my previous postings.
    Are you now satisfied with my general case solution for the two star
    distance problem with included Zenith/Rational Horizon diagram?  It should
    be a rigorous solution unless there are flaws I have not noticed.
    
    I do not incidentally, understand your method which mentions an addition of
    refraction. Refraction should be subtracted every time."
    
    ====================
    
    There is a flaw you still have not noticed, and keep on restating, though I
    have done my best to point it out.
    
    The drawing, attached to your 10 March posting, shows an arc, in red,
    between the calculated positions of star 1 and star 2. The length of that
    arc is NOT the end-product that is needed to calibrate a sextant. What's
    needed is the distance between the APPARENT positions of the two stars,
    which have not been joined by an arc on your diagram.
    
    You wrote- "The refraction affects measured altitude and hence zenith
    distance which is what is effectively measured with a sextant.
    Refraction is always subtracted as the true star position is always below
    the apparent in altitude. Hence between two stars there is a slight increase
    in the true distance between them as opposed to the measured. (see
    diagram)."
    
    and (above) "I do not incidentally, understand your method which mentions an
    addition of refraction. Refraction should be subtracted every time."
    
    NO!
    
    The altitudes of the two stars have to be calculated. Then the refractions
    have to be ADDED, as I have been insisting all along, and you have
    contradicted. To get from a calculated altitude to what would be an observed
    altitude (if anyone had observed it) requires applying refraction in the
    OPPOSITE DIRECTION to what's needed when converting an observed altitude to
    a true altitude, as in reducing an altitude observation.
    
    The effect will be to produce an apparent angle between the stars that is
    always LESS than the theoretical value deduced from the almanac.
    
    George.
    
    contact George Huxtable, at  george@hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site