NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2010 Mar 11, 15:24 -0500
Hi Andres
Thank you very much for sticking with me on this! I discovered that I had inverted one of the terms in Young’s equation.
For the calculated distance
Morris 40d 21m 20.92s.
Ruiz 40d 21m 17.96s, a trivial difference between us of 3 seconds.
For the observed distance, I now get
Corner Cosines 40d 22m 4.67s
Young’s Equation 40d 22m 4.70s
Now there is no difference between my two results and therefore can readily retract my question about which is better.
Corner Cosines and Young’s Equations yield the same result.
Your result for the observed distance is
Ruiz 40d 21m 55.26s
There is a small discrepancy between our results of about 8 seconds.
In tracing this down, I believe it to be the altitude correction and most likely the atmospheric conditions
USNO 1m 36s Sirius altitude correction
1m 36s Alphard altitude correction
Morris 1m 35.47s Sirius
1m 35.79s Alphard
Ruiz 1m 33.43 Sirius
1m 33.74 Alphard
Not only have I corrected this deficiency in the spreadsheet, I have re-cast the interface to accept GHA Aries, SHA Object 1, SHA Object 2, Declination Object 1 & Declination Object 2. Of course,
these items will now come from the Nautical Almanac, not my Skyscout.
Now on to the calibration of the arc of my sextant!
Best Regards
Brad
From: navlist-bounce@fer3.com [mailto:navlist-bounce@fer3.com]
On Behalf Of Andres Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:12 PM
To: NavList@fer3.com
Subject: [NavList] Re: Star - Star Observations
Brad, now i see your two results, and your calculation must have something wrong!
This is using the exact method by Young’s formula:
DSSc = 40.354990 040º 21.3'
DSSo = 40.365349 040º 21.9'
Regards,
Andrés
De: navlist-bounce@fer3.com [mailto:navlist-bounce@fer3.com]
En nombre de Andres Ruiz
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de marzo de 2010 18:01
Para: NavList@fer3.com
Asunto: [NavList] Re: Star - Star Observations
My solution to Brad problema:
Sextant Error by a Star-Star Distance
Input data:
Star 1: Dec = -8.706685 GHA = 39.824131
Star 2: Dec = -16.733655 GHA = 80.449904
star-star distance - sextant: DSSs = 40.353447
Position of the observer:
B = 40.883333
L = -72.800000
heye = 0.000000
Atmospheric parameters:
P = 1010.000000
T = 10.000000
Calculated altitudes:
Hc1 = 31.860800
Z1 = 140.694573
Hc2 = 31.946864
Z2 = 188.640699
Refraction:
R1 = 0.026040
R2 = 0.025953
apparent altitudes:
Ha1 = 31.886763
Ha2 = 31.972740
star-star distance: Calculated and Observed
DSSc = 40.354990
DSSo = 40.365349
Sextant error = Index Error + Instrumental Error:
IE = -0.010359º = -0.621526'
"Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
The information transmitted by this electronic mail (and any attachments) is being sent by or on behalf of Tactronics; it is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee named above and may constitute information that is privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to same, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this electronic mail (or any attachments) or any part thereof. If you have received this electronic mail (and any attachments) in error, please call us immediately and send written confirmation that same has been deleted from your system. Thank you."