NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Systematic error and its resolution
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Apr 6, 16:54 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Apr 6, 16:54 -0400
Geoffrey, Ok, I understood. Actually this is not exactly what we call "index error" (at least for marine sextants) but "combined index+arc+bubble+prismaticity-of-filters+ personal+ whatever systematic error". Alex. On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Geoffrey Kolbe wrote: > > > Alex, the index error of a bubble sextant can be determined from an unknown > position. > > By taking sightings on bodies in opposition, the separation of the > resultant position lines will, on average, be twice the index error. > > In my posting #2531, I advocated taking four sightings, a North-South pair > and an East-West pair, on bodies at the Cardinal points. The North-South > pair effectively give you your latitude and the East-West pair your > longitude. The position lines from the four sightings should form a square > box if index error is the dominant error. If the box is not substantially > square, there is a non-systematic error somewhere which is of the same > order or greater than the index error. > > See http://www.pisces-press.com/desert/14thMarch.jpg for an example of what > I mean. In this example, the box is substantially square, giving us > confidence that the dominant error is indeed index error. The size of the > box is about 10' on a side, from which we deduce that the uncorrected index > error was 5'. The position lines are all 'away from' the body in question, > so the sextant altitudes are 5' too small. I need to add 5' to my altitudes > to correct the index error. > > A subsequent round of sights at a different location a few days later show > the results when this 5' is factored in. See > http://www.pisces-press.com/desert/19thMarch.jpg > > Geoffrey Kolbe > > > At 20:24 06/04/2007, you wrote: > > > > >Geoffrey, > > > > > It is easy to determine the Index Error of a marine > > > sextant, but not of bubble sextants. > > > >Easy or not, but I infer from your message that you > >can find the IC of your bubble sextant SOMEHOW. > > > >I don't see any way to do this at all, > >except taking an altitude from a known position. > > > >This can be done once in a while, but certainly not > >before or after an observation, if the purpose of > >the observation is to find this position. > > > >Alex. > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---